WWC номер KM# 150 Страна США Номинал 1 доллар Год 1921-1935 Наименование Peace Dollar Период Соединенные Штаты Америки (1909 - 1950) Вид чекана Регулярный выпуск Материал Серебро 0.900 Гурт Рубчатый Форма Круг Отношение авс/рев Монетное (180°) Вес (г) 26.73 Диаметр (мм) 38.1 Толщина (мм) 2.5
Австрия 50 шиллингов, 1972 год 350 лет университету в Зальцбурге, предложите
WWC номер KM# 2913 Страна Австрия Номинал 50 шиллингов Год 1972 Наименование 350 лет Зальцбургскому университету Период Вторая Республика (1946 - 2001) Вид чекана Коллекционные монеты Материал Серебро 0.900 Гурт Надпись Описание гурта 'FUENFZIG SCHILLING' Форма Круг Отношение авс/рев Медальное (0°) Вес (г) 20 Диаметр (мм) 34 Толщина (мм) 2.6
"Теперь это все секретно". Уголовное дело за карты 50-летней давности, К копателю пришла ФСБ
"ACCUGRADE™ is the oldest grading Company in the US and Canada. The founding of ACCUGRADE goes back to 1984 when Alan Hager, noted silver dollar expert, invented slab certification for coins. ACCUGRADE paved the way for the industry of coin grading. Today, over 7 million coins have been certified, generating over $140 million in fees to the coin grading services since Mr. Hager's invention in 1985." Some people on other internet media have excoriated Mr. Hager for not -- in their opinion -- following ANA grading guidelines or PCGS guidelines or some other guidelines. A little time on eBay will reveal a broad range of definitions for the grades of coins. You might even find some examples that in your opinion are downright egregious, way outside what you regard as the "norm." That would apply to any grading company's work. ASA Accugrade and Mr. Hager were the FIRST to certify coins, so any "deviations from the norm" come from those who followed. Such changes in standards may be valid, but did in fact, come AFTER. Second, ASA Accugrade (and PCGS and PCI and your favorite dealer and you yourself) are under no obligation to follow the ANA, PCGS, Photograde, or any other system. If you own the DLRC Books about Buffalos or Seateds or Mercs, you know that each series (and issues within each series) must be graded on its own merits. "Known for weak strikes..." is pretty common. Furthermore, the Early American Coppers, Inc., has established a consensus of grading within that speciality that has nothing to do with other grading in US Numismatics. In addition, ancient coins are graded in several ways that (until now) had nothing to do with VF-25 or other American methods. An ancient might be graded "goodVF/choiceFine" (each side graded separately for flan and strike) and that grade is well understood by all active collectors of ancients. There are all kinds of grading "standards" out there, applied to different kinds, types, and series of numismatic items. About 15 to 20 years ago, the Federal Trade Commission cracked down on PCGS, Tulving, and other big name (and small time) companies (destroying some) and in court got them to settle by admitting in writing that GRADING IS SUBJECTIVE. In another thread, Mr. Reid Goldsborough said that Accugrade shut down websites of people who criticized them. However you interpret that, the other side of the coin is that ignorant collectors made wild and unsupportable accusations that potentially damaged the firm's good name. When the error of their ways was pointed out to them, they quit doing it. Interpret that as you want -- just as you grade coins by your own standards. Any time you put a coin in a 2x2 and write a grade on it, you are certifying it. Would you care to put your NAME on the coin as well and have everyone in the hobby judge your grading forever? And then post the results to Rec.Collecting.Coins with comments about your personal integrity? In collecting (coins or paper; ancient or modern; world or US) we always say, "Buy the coin, not the holder." That is all you can say about any service. The first slabbed coin I bought was a pretty Seated Quarter in a PCI holder. I bought it because the dealer endorsed the coin: I knew and cared nothing about grading companies, I just wanted a nice coin. Some services trade well sight-unseen. The CCE network considers only PCGS and NGC with interesting disparities between them. I know of one dealer who does well prefering to buy and sell only ANACS. Grading is subjective. The fact that grading is subjective is the only legally recognized fact about grading. Before you join the lynch mob, get the facts.
Россия продала Великобритании золото на рекордные $5 млрд
[QUOTE]Романовъ пишет: [QUOTE]AllesMunzen пишет: если как были все в рванье так и остались[/QUOTE] Наверное, за всех, не стоит говорить так категорично, но неужели у тебя так все печально, давно не тебя не видел?)[/QUOTE]
да вроде в клубе в столовке виделись 5 дней назад....
Россия продала Великобритании золото на рекордные $5 млрд
не стоит забывать что в конце 2019г сбер купил самый мощный компьютер в мире... угадайте зачем..... а стоил он просто космос..... думаю окупиться за год.... либо же ему подкинули бабосов из бюджета которого нет....
[QUOTE]плюх пишет: Не упускайте тот момент , что ничего не платится если вещь приобретена 3 и более лет назад .
А у кого продажи не постоянны , то ещё нужно посмотреть актуальный налоговый вычет , который не берётся в расчёт если вы владели предметом менее 3 лет.[/QUOTE]
это нужно будет еще доказать.... хозяину что она именно в его хранении свыше 3 лет. и потом еще момент всплыть может что по условиям ввоза старины ее надо поставить на учет в минкульт и хранить бережно.... я уж молчу про копанину....
1 крона 1898 - Австро-Венгерская империя - Франц Иосиф I, предложите
